Are you sure you'd like to remove this alert? You will no longer receive email updates about this topic.
What is next for the treatment of cystic fibrosis, a rare disease market that has boomed in recent years on the back of new drug approvals with hefty price tags? Pipelines are full, but securing reimbursement is a challenge.
Latest From Growth
Integra LifeSciences surged to industry-leading 12% sales growth in 2016, and that's before it prepares to consolidate two of the biggest acquisitions in its history. What is the strategy behind the success of the specialty surgery, orthopedics and tissue tech company that is looking at another double-digit sales uplift in 2017?
Free content: Personalized medicine is upending the business of health care. In March, In Vivo will focus on exploring this new landscape. There is no single "right" route for companies to follow, but pharma, payers and other stakeholders need to find a path because the forces driving personalized medicine are global, and unstoppable.
For decades, biopharma companies have relentlessly pursued growth, counting on pure scale and M&A cost synergies to create value. This strategy is reaching its limits and becoming counterproductive, according to Bain & Co. analysis. Megamergers that don’t produce category leaders also don’t create portfolios that are likely to deliver attractive shareholder returns over time.
UK-listed BTG PLC shares the UK life science industry's concerns about long-term negative fallout from Brexit, but it finds itself in a relatively comfortable position. The acquisitive interventional medicines company says it has plenty of firepower for more M&A.
GE Healthcare’s Life Sciences business continues to build its asset base in the cell and gene therapy sector, and after several strategic M&A deals in recent months is facing 2017 in a confident mood, according to Phil Vanek, cell therapy growth leader.
Five companies in big pharma’s top 20 have come through mergers in the past 10 years or so that changed them significantly. As measured by standard financial performance parameters, the processes at Takeda and Teva (and to some extent, at Allergan) seem relatively smooth and productive. Those at Pfizer and Merck don’t. But it depends on how you look at the numbers.
You must sign in to use this functionality.
Please Sign In
All set! This article has been sent to email@example.com.
All fields are required. For multiple recipients, separate email addresses with a semicolon.
Please Note: Only individuals with active subscriptions will be able to access the full article. All other readers will be directed to the abstract and may purchase the article.